3 ms·
Hardly: History shows the repeated failure of the alternative, where only the "qualified" may vote. Terrible people just corrupt the qualification-mechanism in
by Terr_ 1y ago
Hardly: History shows the repeated failure of the alternative, where only the "qualified" may vote.
Terrible people just corrupt the qualification-mechanism instead. That evil tactic tends to be more-effective and longer-lasting than trying to appeal to the lazy-stupid vote.
- like_any_other 1y ago> only the "qualified" may vote You think this is a fair characterization of what I wrote? That it not being worth sacrificing the security of a voting system to get the most disinterested and incapable to vote, is equivalent to some unstated "qualification" test?