3 ms·
1. Because MS's support for Linux is just marketing, nothing more. 2. Because a VM can't mount a volume on the host which is already mounted. Having volumes on
by lproven 1y ago
1. Because MS's support for Linux is just marketing, nothing more.
2. Because a VM can't mount a volume on the host which is already mounted. Having volumes only accessible to VMs is little use when the VM has its own native formats for that.