4 ms·
Putting people on Mars US equally useless. Any colony on Mars would require enormous support from Earth. It would never be self-suffient. Mars would need water
by bruce511 1y ago
Putting people on Mars US equally useless. Any colony on Mars would require enormous support from Earth. It would never be self-suffient.
Mars would need water, air, energy, raw materials, fuel and everything else for (basically) ever.
There is zero to be gained (here) from a Mars colony. Mars lacks a magnetic field, air to breath, water to drink or cultivate crops, a temperature suitable for plant or animal life, fuel sources to build industry, supply chains for the construction or maintainence of the simplest electrical systems.
Talk of Mars is purely a PR play. Someone will be first. Yay. But Mars will play no part in Earth's future.
- xvilka 1y agoI think we should aim for Ceres[1] instead, which is way more resources rich compared to Mars for a sustainable colony. And a perfect starting point for exploring the rest of the asteroid belt[2]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geology_of_Ceres https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geology_of_Ceres [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonization_of_the_asteroid_belt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonization_of_the_asteroid_b...