3 ms·
> Sharepoint with another 2 RCEs. Not shocked, the software is terrible. However, it's only software that will stand up under load and let us shard it easily. A
by bawolff 1y ago
> Sharepoint with another 2 RCEs. Not shocked, the software is terrible. However, it's only software that will stand up under load and let us shard it easily. All open-source software is one of those, runs fine in Homelab, likely falls down under load. Few Open Source Developers want to work on this stuff which I get because it's tedious work interfacing with computer illiterate end users. I'd rather chug sewage then do this work for free.
Isn't sharepoint just a file share server? (Ive never used it)
I'm sure solutions like samba or an ftp server hold up fine under the load. Its really more a UI question.
- swarnie 1y agoFind me an FTP server which integrates with your entire productivity, communication and collaboration suites easily enough that an admin can run a 50k person company off of it and equally Doris from accounts can manage to get some work done. I hate SharePoint, but i use/administer it every day and it works, mostly. Exposing it to the internet is a mistake. Why anyone would do that is beyond me.
- bawolff 1y agoLike i said, its a UI issue not a scalability issue.
- p_ing 1y agoNo, but storing files is one of it's core functions. The wiki [0] has a decent outline of what it is (may or may not be out of date for on-prem). [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SharePoint https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SharePoint