4 ms·

Thanks for sharing. I'm very familiar with the basic mechanics of quaternion rotation, and I've been interested in a deeper understanding of this double-cover c

Thanks for sharing. I'm very familiar with the basic mechanics of quaternion rotation, and I've been interested in a deeper understanding of this double-cover concept, but I just don't get it. I've seen the belt trick and it feels more like an illusion than an illustration of some deep truth. I like how you've connected it to spin, but I still don't understand how that is a real physical property rather than a mathematical artifact. I don't quite grasp the significance of your "different look". Can you suggest any other reading?

dandanua 1y ago
That look is not that different. I bring attention to the fact that a product of quaternions all close to 1 can be close to -1, which correspond to a 2pi rotation too. This fact is a bit simpler to grasp than a topological explanation, where you consider a topology on the space of all rotations and show that some paths that correspond to 2pi rotation are different than the others. There are multiple youtube videos explaining the topological argument, see, e.g., this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACZC_XEyg9U https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACZC_XEyg9U. The topological argument gives a larger picture and probably better understanding, but it is definitely harder.
- alanbernstein 1y ago
  I see, thanks. Sounds like I was overthinking it.