3 ms·
Even according to the article: "2,200 to 2,400 watts per meter per kelvin - roughly six times as conductive as copper.". It's way higher than copper in fact. Co
by xxs 1y ago
Even according to the article: "2,200 to 2,400 watts per meter per kelvin - roughly six times as conductive as copper.". It's way higher than copper in fact. Copper is ~400 W/(m·K)