> All while the author—who clearly only skimmed their “own” code—is taking no responsibility, going “whoopsie, Claude wrote that. Silly AI, ha-ha.” After you m

> All while the author—who clearly only skimmed their “own” code—is taking no responsibility, going “whoopsie, Claude wrote that. Silly AI, ha-ha.” After you made your colleagues upset submitting crappy code for review, you start to pay attention. > LLM-written ones are almost entirely additive, Unless you noticed that code has to be removed, and you instruct the LLM to do so. I don't think LLMs really change the dynamics here. "Good programmers" will still submit good code, easy for their colleagues to review, whether it was written with the help of an LLM or not.