4 ms·
> I'm not at all convinced the US can build anything anymore. But it has! Look at all of our private industry! That's the point! > We don't have titans of ind
by dfee 1y ago
> I'm not at all convinced the US can build anything anymore.
But it has! Look at all of our private industry! That's the point!
> We don't have titans of industry anymore.
What?!
- testing22321 1y agoSpaceX and to a much lesser extent Tesla are good examples. Excluding those for a minute, what else does the US have world-leading manufacturing of? Semiconductors? Nope. High speed rail? Nope. Auto industry? Nope. Major infrastructure projects like bridges, tunnels, airports, etc? Nope. Electronics (phones/laptops/etc)? Nope. ????? The US is not exactly a manufacturing powerhouse.
- GolfPopper 1y agoIt is a rent extraction/wealth transfer powerhouse. At least for now.
- shdh 1y agoCan you elaborate how SpaceX is an extraction/wealth transfer powerhouse?
- jmyeet 1y agoI'm not sure which company you're referring to here but I do here this claim a lot about SpaceX and while i'm anti-rent-seeking I don't see SpaceX as a rent-seeking company. Yes it has gotten some grants to develop particular programs and promises from the US government to buy services but all up we're talking about (IIRC) $10-20 billion. We just gave $40 billion to Argentina for pretty much no reason whatsoever. Now the US government has spent a whole lot more on SpaceX but they're buying services. SpaceX is an incredible bargain compared to the alternatives like ULA.
- hollerith 1y agoThe production of cutting-edge semiconductors requires a global supply chain. The US's main contribution to that supply chain is (very expensive) software required in the design of an IC. The US is second in manufacturing and far ahead of numbers 3 and 4 (Germany and Japan IIRC).
- heavyset_go 1y agoAnyone can write software, the idea that we're uniquely capable in that domain is foolhardy
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- MostlyStable 1y agoAnyone can do any of those above industries as well, what's your point?
- heavyset_go 1y agoSee the grandparent's comment about global supply chains. Everyone requires everyone else in those industries, no one does it all on their own. I posit that software has no such supply chain dependency, literally anyone can do it, and thinking the US is unique in their ability to produce software isn't accurate.
- parineum 1y agoWhy doesn't everyone else simply start their own silocon valley!?
- heavyset_go 1y agoByteDance, Alibaba, Baidu, three of Silicon Valley's most famous companies responsible for uniquely American successes like TikTok.
- parineum 1y ago> literally anyone can do it Doesn't it seem odd to you that only the two largest economies in the world are doing something so lucrative if literally anyone can do it?
- ks2048 1y agoWhy mention Tesla in here? They produce 1.8M cars/year while GM and Ford produce 6M and 4M, respectively. (2023. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_automotive_manufacturers_by_production https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_automotive_manufacture...)
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- testing22321 1y agoGM went bankrupt, and are not producing anything that would sell globally. They’re a dead company walking. If the Chinese EV tariffs are dropped, or if BYD start manufacturing at scale in the US, all the old US auto manufacturers are dead.
- tayo42 1y agoAmericans like f1/2/350 to much
- getpokedagain 1y agoTeslas are built like shit compared to other cars.
- sollewitt 1y agoData centers.