3 ms·
> φ³ = 16.817 (exact) No it isn't. This is such an obvious error that I must assume an LLM wrote it, and not one of the better ones. Edit: Seeing your other
by ben_w 1y ago
> φ³ = 16.817 (exact)
No it isn't.
This is such an obvious error that I must assume an LLM wrote it, and not one of the better ones.
Edit: Seeing your other comments, you've already been told this, and I was even correct that it was an obsolete model.
- southwindcg 1y agoThis is the second obviously-LLM-written physics post this morning and I expect as the chat bots get better, we're going to see so many more of them. Maybe people are seeing the likes of Terrence Howard getting attention for nonsensical "science" "theories" and wanting to get in on the grift... I don't know.