The whole thesis that AGI will come about through advances in coding agents makes zero sense. This isn't a coding problem - it's first a matter of defining the

The whole thesis that AGI will come about through advances in coding agents makes zero sense. This isn't a coding problem - it's first a matter of defining the goal ("AGI" means nothing), then considering architectures and learning algorithms, etc, capable of achieving it. What's needed isn't agentic coding ability but rather creativity and ability to design new learning algorithms that are not to be found in the training data. Coding is the least problem, and I'd guess today's Claude Code, etc is well capable of doing the drudgework.