4 ms·
So much delusion on display here. The folks talking about replacing 95% of remote jobs by 2030 in particular seem to have no idea what people actually do in the
by skywhopper 1y ago
So much delusion on display here. The folks talking about replacing 95% of remote jobs by 2030 in particular seem to have no idea what people actually do in their work, and how decisions get made, not to mention the actual current state of generative AI.
- mnky9800n 1y agoyes but it gets them views which gets ad revenue payout from youtube, tiktok, instagram, etc.
- bgwalter 1y agoYes, these people have never written anything useful, so they don't know. At best an "AI" researcher writes some plagiarized version of the transformer architecture, which is the used to plagiarize other people's hard earned code. The entire absence of guilt in these "academics" is notable. They are complete psychopaths.
- consumer451 1y agoThere is a lot to be said about Zuck, but in his last Dwarkesh interview I remember him being a realist about fast take-off. It was something like "If I look at team xzy, I don't see the bottleneck being a lack of smart devs." However, to be fair, since that podcast, he has spent insane money on ML researchers...
- recursivecaveat 1y agoIt's a tale as old as time: "Everyone else's job can be easily automated. They are basically just mindlessly copy pasting from PDF to spreadsheet to word doc all day. My job on the other hand requires some subtle nuance and human judgement that won't be automated anytime soon."