After seeing the website but before reading your comments I honestly thought it was an elaborate piece of satire designed to mock people who demand "source?" fr

After seeing the website but before reading your comments I honestly thought it was an elaborate piece of satire designed to mock people who demand "source?" from you as a rhetorical demand for asymmetrical effort. And I actually think it would be funny and useful that way as a tongue in cheek response to such bad faith demands. Retrospectively finding evidence to support a claim is the wrong way around