2 ms·
Nobody has oral history from 7700 years ago.
by weregiraffe 1y ago
Nobody has oral history from 7700 years ago.
- suddenlybananas 1y agoI agree, but the linked article claims otherwise.
- IAmBroom 1y agoAn unprovable assertion, I'll note. So: opinion.
- grebc 1y agoLol seen the homepage of the ABC? (Australian not American broadcaster).
- harvey9 1y agoThat's a really interesting site. Thanks for the tip.
- ethersteeds 1y agoI assume you're referring to this?https://www.abc.net.au/news/deeptime/ https://www.abc.net.au/news/deeptime/
- carlosjobim 1y agoOf course they can, why not? The example in the article is really good and perfectly believable. People at that time would wander around a lot in their everyday life, and it would be very easy to remember these small stories which are connected to the landscape. A father would tell his son when they were walking past this feature of the landscape, and the son would later tell his son and so on. Why? Because they didn't have cell phones to scroll on while wandering, or a radio to listen to. And they weren't thinking about their mortgage or about primaries. When you live in a world like this, it is very easy to remember a bunch of unusual stories, and when they're connected to the landscape instead of to people, it is almost a guarantee that they will be passed on for generations.
- IAmBroom 1y agoBecause of the game of Telephone. Humans aren't capable of repeating stories without permutation.
- carlosjobim 1y agoThat applies to the written word as well. You can never guarantee that your modern understanding of what a word means is the same as what the original writer meant.