Definitely keep at it. Also, we should know the accuracy of comparable tests. Reading the article, I'm still not sure about the accuracy, and don't have the ti

Definitely keep at it. Also, we should know the accuracy of comparable tests. Reading the article, I'm still not sure about the accuracy, and don't have the time to carefully parse the whole article. I see at least the following statements (there may be more): The trial followed 25,000 adults from the US and Canada over a year, with nearly one in 100 getting a positive result. For 62% of these cases, cancer was later confirmed. and The test correctly ruled out cancer in over 99% of those who tested negative.