Sorry, that line about "reading the prompt" was unclear, I was referencing people who use it to write emails, project updates, etc. Boilerplate natural language

Sorry, that line about "reading the prompt" was unclear, I was referencing people who use it to write emails, project updates, etc. Boilerplate natural language that most people skim over because most of it is fluff. I'm well aware that large scale AI coding requires much more guidance than a single prompt. Regardless, I would be more charitable if people like you didn't make statements such as, paraphrased, "the burden of proof is on the person suggesting the null hypothesis." I'm open to being convinced, but until now the only real study I've seen for coding shows no gain from AI. The anecdotes I have are mostly things like a coworker's 50kloc project that hasn't seen the light of day because it's massive, unreviewable, and takes as long to test as it would to have for a human to write something equivalent in <<50kloc. Your project is the first one I've heard of that seems to be successful, and I'm curious to learn more. Just to confirm, your project is not majority boilerplate, functional enough that you'd feel comfortable releasing it to others, and you're able to get bugs fixed without too much trouble? That's pretty rare from what I've seen, and is definitely going at the top of my list of anecdotes in support of AI coding!