4 ms·

Incited a riot to interrupt the certification of the election with ~500 individuals resulting in the deaths of a few individuals and hundreds of convictions. Mo

Incited a riot to interrupt the certification of the election with ~500 individuals resulting in the deaths of a few individuals and hundreds of convictions. Most notable Trump did not face prosecution.

deleted 1y ago
[deleted]
RandomBacon 1y ago
I edited my previous comment because I knew of January 6th, I was just thinking OP meant something else. However I did not follow the events or aftermath with great detail. Considering he was prosecuted for other things, I'm guessing there was not any actual evidence to support even a prosection?
- mrbombastic 1y ago
  This is not some secret information, google it.
  - RandomBacon 1y ago
    Sorry, there is a lot of misinformation from "both sides" - That is why I don't care much to watch the dog and pony show while I "dress myself" (to the person who wrote that, really?)
    - mrbombastic 1y ago
      I am going to try to take this thread in good faith. Here is an event that happened on Saturday, 7 million plus people took to the streets. One side says this was a Hate America rally made up of marxists, hamas supporters and protestors paid by George Soros. The president shared an AI video of himself in a crown flying over the protesters he is supposed to represent dumping shit on them. Every news outlet on the other side says it was a peaceful protest against authoritarian overreach. Call me a biased leftist but the misinformation and divisive bullshit is severely tipped to the right side of the scale.
      - exasperaited 1y ago
        > I am going to try to take this thread in good faith I am less inclined: “he did leave though” as evidence of innocence was a typical bad faith sea-lioned argument throughout election season.
    - reddozen 1y ago
      There isn't. The misinformation is from one side. You can just read the Jan 6 select committees report or just ask Grok to slop summarize it for you.
- throwawayq3423 1y ago
  > I'm guessing there was not any actual evidence to support even a prosection? You don't have to guess, there was. So much so that the special counsel that was shut down when Trump won re-election took the extraordinary step of declaring publicly that he had more than enough evidence to secure conviction of Donald Trump for Jan 6th. https://www.npr.org/2025/01/14/g-s1-42358/trump-jack-smith-election-report https://www.npr.org/2025/01/14/g-s1-42358/trump-jack-smith-e...
- Gud 1y ago
  Not just prosecuted, convicted.

deleted 1y ago

[deleted]

RandomBacon 1y ago

I edited my previous comment because I knew of January 6th, I was just thinking OP meant something else. However I did not follow the events or aftermath with great detail. Considering he was prosecuted for other things, I'm guessing there was not any actual evidence to support even a prosection?

mrbombastic 1y ago
This is not some secret information, google it.
- RandomBacon 1y ago
  Sorry, there is a lot of misinformation from "both sides" - That is why I don't care much to watch the dog and pony show while I "dress myself" (to the person who wrote that, really?)
  - mrbombastic 1y ago
    I am going to try to take this thread in good faith. Here is an event that happened on Saturday, 7 million plus people took to the streets. One side says this was a Hate America rally made up of marxists, hamas supporters and protestors paid by George Soros. The president shared an AI video of himself in a crown flying over the protesters he is supposed to represent dumping shit on them. Every news outlet on the other side says it was a peaceful protest against authoritarian overreach. Call me a biased leftist but the misinformation and divisive bullshit is severely tipped to the right side of the scale.
    - exasperaited 1y ago
      > I am going to try to take this thread in good faith I am less inclined: “he did leave though” as evidence of innocence was a typical bad faith sea-lioned argument throughout election season.
  - reddozen 1y ago
    There isn't. The misinformation is from one side. You can just read the Jan 6 select committees report or just ask Grok to slop summarize it for you.
throwawayq3423 1y ago
> I'm guessing there was not any actual evidence to support even a prosection? You don't have to guess, there was. So much so that the special counsel that was shut down when Trump won re-election took the extraordinary step of declaring publicly that he had more than enough evidence to secure conviction of Donald Trump for Jan 6th. https://www.npr.org/2025/01/14/g-s1-42358/trump-jack-smith-election-report https://www.npr.org/2025/01/14/g-s1-42358/trump-jack-smith-e...
Gud 1y ago
Not just prosecuted, convicted.