Taken from: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45643100 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45643100 which I posted elsewhere 10hrs ago. I'm also of that pe

Taken from: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45643100 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45643100 which I posted elsewhere 10hrs ago. I'm also of that perspective. It's sort of worth noting though that when Microsoft is presented with an option for blocking out Linux installation: they take it.[0] When Apple are presented with an option for allowing Linux, they take it.[1] The major difference here is OEMs, and that Apple has no OEMs. We're essentially giving Microsoft the moral high ground even though they do nothing to earn it. [0]: https://www.mickaelwalter.fr/linux-on-surface-rt/#:~:text=Also%2C%20for%20these%20models%2C%20Microsoft,supporting%20ARM%2C%20etc... https://www.mickaelwalter.fr/linux-on-surface-rt/#:~:text=Al... [1]: https://asahilinux.org/about/#:~:text=Apple%20allows%20booting%20unsigned%2Fcustom,Apple%20built%20into%20these%20devices. https://asahilinux.org/about/#:~:text=Apple%20allows%20booti...