> I always wondered if a random-cracy wouldn't be better in the end, just pick anyone that cares to have a position by lottery and have a limited term and basic

> I always wondered if a random-cracy wouldn't be better in the end, just pick anyone that cares to have a position by lottery and have a limited term and basic checks and balances. This seems like a pretty decent idea to me. Instead of making it the main legislative body though Id have it like the house of lords. Expected to pass laws passed by the democratic body but with the ability to say no if things get crazy. No duty to engage with politics, they just get paid to focus on whether the laws actually make sense.