> I think it's to early to call it traditional. I guess the bigger point is that we could offer the same charity to the OP that I'm lending you here in your us

> I think it's to early to call it traditional. I guess the bigger point is that we could offer the same charity to the OP that I'm lending you here in your use of the wrong "to". There are meaningful critiques elsewhere in the comments about the piece with some semblance of charitable interpretation. We've elected instead to manufacture a snide, pedestrian haughtiness about wording.