4 ms·
Since this is old, I assume someone found these photos and then manually selected the pointer location. Maybe used openCV or something like that.. But I'd most
by eknkc 1y ago
Since this is old, I assume someone found these photos and then manually selected the pointer location. Maybe used openCV or something like that.. But I'd most likely go with manual.
There are 700+ images defined in https://pointerpointer.com/new-positions.json https://pointerpointer.com/new-positions.json and the script finds the closest match to the current mouse pointer.
- sky2224 1y agoYeah probably. It likely made it significantly easier given that the images are always super zoomed in, so a single finger pointing covers roughly 6-8 mouse pointer locations (I'm kind of eye-balling it here).
- GuB-42 1y agoThe images are also shifted to match the mouse pointer exactly, easier to notice near the edges.
- 1-more 1y ago710. Did a binary search on the URLs. Didn't look at the JS, whoops.
- tomjakubowski 1y agoYou often don't even have to read any JS to find these things. Check the network tab, maybe filter by application/json.
- 1-more 1y agoJS as a synecdoche for JS and everything it requests. I may be the only person who says that. I may be asking you to read my mind. Unfair. Ah well.