3 ms·
Why? It worked decades without these demands or federal oversight. The interpretation is also based on the possible outcomes. It's just facts and it's certainly
by BoredPositron 1y ago
Why? It worked decades without these demands or federal oversight. The interpretation is also based on the possible outcomes. It's just facts and it's certainly not about feelings if you sign your rights and possible future as an institution away. Did you read my the last paragraph? Nobody - not a person, not a corporation, nor a government would sign shit like this.
- FridayoLeary 1y agoUniversities are increasingly broken. Look up some of the threads here discussing that. Their self indulgent excesses have gotten worse in recent years. Conservative thought in particular is increasingly rare, so it makes sense that a very conservative administration would be asking questions about what they are paying for, and it is they who are paying in the form of taxes. You are basing your outcomes on the worst possible intentions of the administration, which i think you are wrong about because you haven't properly looked at the situation from their point of view or even objectively. I do agree however that if i was a university i wouldn't sign it without first amending 4 and 9.
- BoredPositron 1y agoSo it's not reasonable got it.