> You get deterministic failure modes instead of dragons flying out of your nose What Go currently has does not solve this problem, which is what I'm pointing

> You get deterministic failure modes instead of dragons flying out of your nose What Go currently has does not solve this problem, which is what I'm pointing out. Your argument is basically "not handling the error Looks Bad". Mine is "It should be impossible to do wrong". Something like ADT's would have been very welcomed, then we could just have a classy option type or either type.