3 ms·
That is sloppy thinking. If you have private property and the ability to profit from labor then you have Capitalism. The need to regulate architectural liabilit
by m0llusk 1y ago
That is sloppy thinking. If you have private property and the ability to profit from labor then you have Capitalism. The need to regulate architectural liabilities goes back as far as history. The current thinking that any regulation impedes Capitalism is both radical and new.
- cyanydeez 1y agoOk, bit you wpuld not have profit if you had to pay for labors heapthcare Sloppy is not knowing what externalities are.
- edoceo 1y agoOne can still have profit and pay for healthcare. Dozens of examples exist.
- cyanydeez 1y agoThen explain why the largest capitalist government can't do that.
- StackRanker3000 1y agoIt could, it just doesn’t want to. Or at least the inertia and obstacles of gaining enough political support for doing it, paired with the reluctance of the powerful entities that gain from the existing system, prevents it from happening. But there is nothing that makes it fundamentally incompatible with still allowing private enterprise and profit
- cyanydeez 1y agoFundamentally, not paying for externalities is why it "succeeds". It's foundational. As I stated at the top.
- Jensson 1y agoCapitalism succeeds even where they do pay for externalities, so you are wrong.
- cyanydeez 1y agoreally, is that why all these brownfields were abandoned? We got billion dollar contamination everywhere that no one wants and random people suffer. It's simply a failed accounting system you have.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]