3 ms·
The difference is that in the industrial revolution there was a migration from hard physical labor to cushy information work. Now that information work is bein
by beeflet 1y ago
The difference is that in the industrial revolution there was a migration from hard physical labor to cushy information work.
Now that information work is being automated, there will be nothing left!
This "embrace or die" strategy obviously doesn't work on a societal scale, it is an individual strategy.
- brainwad 1y agoMost people are not doing "information" work. They provide interpersonal services, such as health/aged/childcare or retail/hospitality/leisure. Techies are angsty because they are the small minority who will be disrupted. But let's not pretend most of the economy is even amenable to this technology.
- anon7725 1y ago> Techies are angsty because they are the small minority who will be disrupted. But let's not pretend most of the economy is even amenable to this technology. Think of all the jobs that do not involve putting your hands on something that is crucial to the delivery of a service (a keyboard, phone, money, etc does not count). All of those jobs are amenable to this technology. It is probably at least 30% of the economy in a first pass, if not more.
- anon7725 1y ago> in the industrial revolution there was a migration from hard physical labor to cushy information work. The industrial revolution started in the early 1800's. It was a migration from hard physical labor outdoors, around the home and in small workshops to hard physical labor in factories.