4 ms·
> Kevin Weil had the two previous quotes in his context when he did his post and didn't consider the fact that readers would only see the first level, so wouldn
by moefh 1y ago
> Kevin Weil had the two previous quotes in his context when he did his post and didn't consider the fact that readers would only see the first level, so wouldn't have Sebastien Bubek's post in mind when they read his.
No, Weil said he himself misunderstood Sellke's post[1].
Note Weil's wording (10 previously unsolved Erdos problems) vs. Sellke's wording (10 Erdos problems that were listed as open).
[1] https://x.com/kevinweil/status/1979270343941591525 https://x.com/kevinweil/status/1979270343941591525
- GodelNumbering 1y agoAlso, previous comment omitted the part that now-deleted tweet from Bubeck begins with "Science revolution via AI has officially begun...".