Besides the LLVM drama, we do have a libgcc for jit library now, which uses just the backend to create a better jit than llvm. More speed and more backends. Di

Besides the LLVM drama, we do have a libgcc for jit library now, which uses just the backend to create a better jit than llvm. More speed and more backends. Did Dave Malcolm contact RMS privately as he said then? I only know about https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg00228.html https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg00228.h... Why did RMS back down then? He still opposes a ffi for emacs, even if behind the scenes there is now a ffi in emacs for gtk.