Critiques should come with some argument if they want to be taken seriously. If I say it’s not real intelligence because the box isn’t blue, how much does anyo

Critiques should come with some argument if they want to be taken seriously. If I say it’s not real intelligence because the box isn’t blue, how much does anyone owe that critique? How about if a billion people say that blueness is the essence missing from AIs? Tell me why blue matters and we have a conversation.