4 ms·

I'll repeat: When you twist protective measures against ongoing theft or shitty proposals that went nowhere into a nefarious conspiracy to justify the theft of

I'll repeat: When you twist protective measures against ongoing theft or shitty proposals that went nowhere into a nefarious conspiracy to justify the theft of critical Ruby infrastructure, it’s time to take a hard look in the mirror. What are you trying to achieve here, bringing up debunked insinuations over and over and over again? And haha no, going over every cherry-picked fact and half-truth you explicitly stated doesn’t prove you aren’t making insinuations. > insinuate: to impart or suggest in an artful or indirect way https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/insinuated https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/insinuated Note the word "indirect."

tptacek 1y ago
Which of these insinuations have been "debunked"? Did they happen or not? If they happened, but you're OK with the reason they happened, they weren't "debunked"; they were, to you, "mitigated".
- jcmfernandes 1y ago
  Arko explained why he changed the password. Yes, he should have communicated the change, and that's on him. I still can't understand why RC preferred to publish a hit piece on him instead of... calling him to ask if he had changed the password? Bonkers. Now, are you using that to justify the hostile takeover of critical infrastructure to the entire Ruby community? I'm baffled. RC did a *hostile takeover*. How many times do I have to repeat this?
  - tptacek 1y ago
    Here you are, saying out loud that RC would have needed to call Arko to ask if Arko had changed the password. There are one too many "if"'s in that sentence!
    - jcmfernandes 1y ago
      I'm questioning why they didn't call him. Why? And why are you ignoring that RC did a hostile takeover of the repos? Again, RC stole the repos. What do you think of that?
      - tptacek 1y ago
        Why in the everloving cosmic fuck did he not tell them? In a great many circumstances what he did is a crime. Nobody's coming after him on this but if this was me I would paper the everloving fuck out of what I did so there wasn't even a possibility that the owner of the account had any uncertainty as to what happened. I don't know what happened with "the repos", is why I haven't offered an opinion about it. I have a professional interest in stories about people gaining unauthorized access to accounts. I assure you, the law doesn't weigh one party's transgression against the other the way you suggest it should.
        jcmfernandes 1y ago
        I find your obsession over Andre's fault and disdain towards the stealing of the repos by RC amusing. And you know what? I think you're right! What Andre did could constitute a crime. Any serious organization would lawyer up and go after him... right? RIGHT?
        tptacek 1y ago
        Did you stop reading 2 sentences in to my last comment?
        jcmfernandes 1y ago
        Do you want to debate or continue with the gaslighting?

tptacek 1y ago

Which of these insinuations have been "debunked"? Did they happen or not? If they happened, but you're OK with the reason they happened, they weren't "debunked"; they were, to you, "mitigated".

jcmfernandes 1y ago
Arko explained why he changed the password. Yes, he should have communicated the change, and that's on him. I still can't understand why RC preferred to publish a hit piece on him instead of... calling him to ask if he had changed the password? Bonkers. Now, are you using that to justify the hostile takeover of critical infrastructure to the entire Ruby community? I'm baffled. RC did a *hostile takeover*. How many times do I have to repeat this?
- tptacek 1y ago
  Here you are, saying out loud that RC would have needed to call Arko to ask if Arko had changed the password. There are one too many "if"'s in that sentence!
  - jcmfernandes 1y ago
    I'm questioning why they didn't call him. Why? And why are you ignoring that RC did a hostile takeover of the repos? Again, RC stole the repos. What do you think of that?
    - tptacek 1y ago
      Why in the everloving cosmic fuck did he not tell them? In a great many circumstances what he did is a crime. Nobody's coming after him on this but if this was me I would paper the everloving fuck out of what I did so there wasn't even a possibility that the owner of the account had any uncertainty as to what happened. I don't know what happened with "the repos", is why I haven't offered an opinion about it. I have a professional interest in stories about people gaining unauthorized access to accounts. I assure you, the law doesn't weigh one party's transgression against the other the way you suggest it should.
      - jcmfernandes 1y ago
        I find your obsession over Andre's fault and disdain towards the stealing of the repos by RC amusing. And you know what? I think you're right! What Andre did could constitute a crime. Any serious organization would lawyer up and go after him... right? RIGHT?
        tptacek 1y ago
        Did you stop reading 2 sentences in to my last comment?
        jcmfernandes 1y ago
        Do you want to debate or continue with the gaslighting?