2 ms·
she cites psychological research -- except that it's the Gladwell/Surowiecki affirmative self-help for New Yorker readers kind of research. She is certainly no
by blasdel 18y ago
she cites psychological research -- except that it's the Gladwell/Surowiecki affirmative self-help for New Yorker readers kind of research.
She is certainly nowhere near as bad as Scoble: only Winer can keep him company in the innermost circle of blog hell.
I had totally erased that damn Head First Design Patterns book from my memory, maybe she does belong in an inner circle of hell...
- ahoyhere 18y ago> * except that it's the Gladwell/Surowiecki affirmative self-help for New Yorker readers* I'd like to see you back that statement up. I subscribe to the cogsci, psych, creativity, metaphor and memory journals online. I know what stuff she cites.