3 ms·
It was not very common to interleave assembly in MS-DOS IDEs. Assembler and its IDE were separate tools you paid for. But not unheard of. You could "dump" your
by miohtama 1y ago
It was not very common to interleave assembly in MS-DOS IDEs. Assembler and its IDE were separate tools you paid for. But not unheard of.
You could "dump" your OBJ file for assembly.
Later C compilers got some better inline assembler support but this was towards the 32-bit era already.
Also Borland had its own compiler, linker and such as separate binaries you could run with a Makefile but you really never had to, as why would you when you can do that in the IDE in a single keypress.
- int_19h 1y agoIt was quite common actually, most DOS C compilers supported asm{} blocks and Turbo Pascal also supported inline assembly. Paid assemblers like MASM were high-end tools. On Unix though it was more common to have .s files separately.