4 ms·
I wasn't paying attention to when 30 years ago actually was... So disappointing to expect a GUI Smalltalk System Browser and seeing DOS TUIs. And then delight
by karmakaze 1y ago
I wasn't paying attention to when 30 years ago actually was...
So disappointing to expect a GUI Smalltalk System Browser and seeing DOS TUIs.
And then delight recalling Turbo C/Pascal and MS C 4.0 with CodeView that even worked in 43 or 50 line modes.
- jll29 1y agoYes, me too, I was expecting either Smalltalk or LISP machine GUIs. Having said that, some old TUIs were clearer and faster even on weaker hardware. This should be a lesson for us today. Color transitions and animated icons flying over the desktop are NOT what I need, but speed, clarity, and discoverability of more rarely used functionality are vital.
- igouy 1y agoMay 1988 -- Smalltalk/V 286 -- on IBM-PC, PS/2 or compatible, with an 80286 or 80386 "INTRODUCTION TO THE SMALLTALK/V 286 ENVIRONMENT" http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr/FreeBooks/SmalltalkVTutorial/SmalltalkVTutorial.pdf http://stephane.ducasse.free.fr/FreeBooks/SmalltalkVTutorial...
- pjmlp 1y agoThat was my introduction to Smalltalk.
- igouy 1y agoditto So much better than the TUI Smalltalk/V
- NetMageSCW 1y agoMethods.
- igouy 1y agoYes. I'd seen Methods a year earlier and chose to make a prototype with Lotus 123 instead. Then Smalltalk/V 286 became available.
- bryantnyc 1y agoAnyone else on here recall IBM VisualAge for Smalltalk -> VAST, or Cincom Smalltalk?