sure, lots of things can be true at the same time without being mutually exclusive — the way I see it, it looks like there's great effort being made out there i

sure, lots of things can be true at the same time without being mutually exclusive — the way I see it, it looks like there's great effort being made out there in how to characterize and propagate the collective understanding of tools — what's the goal there? is this a "call this something else please" type of work? in the spirit of metalinguistics, what do you call this branch of human nature and behaviour as it pertains to our evolution of knowledge and use of language to apply it as a species like, we clearly are deriving some kind of value from the current AI as a product — are some researchers and scientists just unhappy that these companies are doing that by using marketing that doesn't comply with their world views? does someone know of other similar parallels in history where perhaps the same happened? I'm sure we butchered words in different domains with complex meanings and I bet you some of these, looking back, are a bunch of nothing burgers