4 ms·
I’m not sure an ad hominem assault is any different. You make proclamations without any evidence as if what you say has any more credibility than the next perso
by hopelite 1y ago
I’m not sure an ad hominem assault is any different. You make proclamations without any evidence as if what you say has any more credibility than the next person. In fact, this response makes a reasonable person discount you.
Sure, it reads like some biased and coping, possibly even interested or paid hit-piece as if what happens can be changed by just being really negative about LLMs, but maybe consider taking your own advice there, kid; you know, an extended break.
- mellosouls 1y agoPlease give an example of how we might criticise somebody's method of communication and general strong decline in useful contributions to debate (of the order of that of Marcus) without you complaining ad hominem.