3 ms·
The article feels like LLM output, too. (And they don't actually credit an author in the byline.) Is there another source out there that this was based on? Can
by Steuard 1y ago
The article feels like LLM output, too. (And they don't actually credit an author in the byline.) Is there another source out there that this was based on? Can we read that instead, and skip the extra layer of interpretation/distortion?
- phyzome 1y agoHere's an actual article, which you can find by following the DOI: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adp6699 https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adp6699 -- unfortunately not open access, so it's not feasible for me to check if anything in the HN link is actually true, or just LLM guesses.