3 ms·
Don't assume robots will always replace people. We have, after all, seen robot factories replaced by poorly paid humans in China. If low skilled jobs keep bein
by Tloewald 14y ago
Don't assume robots will always replace people. We have, after all, seen robot factories replaced by poorly paid humans in China.
If low skilled jobs keep being handed over to robots, eventually we get a lot of people with no valuable skills. These people will be poor and largely unemployed. If you take away welfare, collective bargaining, minimum wage, and a safety net then these people will work for literally crumbs (ocnsider people who live on garbage dumps in India). For many many roles these people will be cheaper than robots.
This is, incidentally, the lot of the poor before the welfare state was created, and it's what the Tea Party wants to recreate.
- paulhauggis 14y agoIt kind of sounds like copyrights for people.
- faucet 14y agoShouldn't the education also be a part of the equation here? Or did you drop it out of your reasoning for a reason. And another thought, if there will be no balance on employment and wages - who is supposed to be buying the production of those robots?
- pc86 14y agoJust because it's a MoJo article doesn't mean this is the place to wax philosophic about your personal political beliefs.