3 ms·
Well yes, because those who don't quickly lose users due to bad signal-noise ratio When was the last time anyone visited an unmoderated usenet group?
by bawolff 1y ago
Well yes, because those who don't quickly lose users due to bad signal-noise ratio
When was the last time anyone visited an unmoderated usenet group?
- cft 1y ago4chan is well, moderated, but it's outlived Facebook with real names.
- throwaway48476 1y agoDid the government ever moderate usenet?
- Razengan 1y agoFrankly, LLMs with transparent prompts, as well as user-side filters based on LLM prompts (e.g. "Don't show me comment threads talking shit about Attack on Titan") could do a better and more "fair" job than meat-based moderators now. They won't have personal biases, don't need to sleep (ending the infamous "mods are asleep, post xxx" waves), their prompts would be visible to everyone, and there could be ways for the users themselves to update the space's rules/prompts.
- squigz 1y agoLLMs have their own biases. But either way, I want people like dang to be the ones moderating and managing a community - call it "personal bias" if you'd like, but they have a vision for the space, and as long as I as a user think that that vision is of a community I want to be in, then it's fine. If I no longer think it is... I leave.