12 ms·

> Hyprland and all its contributors are now also considered fascist from taking sponsorship money from 37signals This methodology is definitely not how you dis

> Hyprland and all its contributors are now also considered fascist from taking sponsorship money from 37signals This methodology is definitely not how you discover fascism. But it is how fascists and communists defined and traced their enemies in the 20th century.

badosu 1y ago
This. While I am all for making conscious choices on what to support I can't take anything phrased like that seriously "all is contributors". Hyprland, while inferior (imo) in some aspects to sway on the wayland tiling manager landscape is a fine piece of software that I use on my non-work computer (I still use sway for stability). Back on the topic: I reiterate I'd be happy to avoid using or supporting projects based on non-purely technical issues (discussion on "pure technicality" omitted for brevity). It's just... What, do I need to know every persons imo completely irrelevant opinions on whatever du jour hot political topic? Maybe the answer could be yes, I would be fine with dropping Hyprland support, maybe I will after digging a bit more. But this whole thing just reeks to me of terminally informed and ragebaited people looking for a platform to vomit their completely irrelevant opinions, actions speak more (e.g. fostering a dangerous environment _adjacent to the project_ based on discrimination). I just feel I want to nope out of this industry and everything related to it, it's very overwhelming.
- the_gastropod 1y ago
  > What, do I need to know every persons imo completely irrelevant opinions on whatever du jour hot political topic? No. But if they're using their social capital they've built via their software contributions (like DHH) to spread racist nonsense, then maybe it's worth considering alternatives, or at the very least, stop supporting those projects.
  - badosu 1y ago
    Sure, but I think there's a spectrum when making that decision: "should keep their bullshit to themselves" <---> "should perhaps take leadership and avoid having their public channel a cesspool" <---> "actively encourages/participates in discriminatory practices" <---> "raging maniac hurting people, rallying for X" Specifically on the topic of RubyGems: I couldn't care less about what DHH posts or not, I certainly care that he uses his position to influence a chain of actors to interfere with something that always worked just because X. I couldn't care less about the other side on the "cancel" mission, I care about influencing a chain of actors to interfere with something that always worked just because Y. Please quarantine your political polarization/culture wars bullshit, non-anglo countries don't need it.
ljm 1y ago
Turns out guilt by association is problematic whether it’s a Gestapo tactic or a terminally online one. People need to step back and breathe. It’s possible to feel one thing about a (frankly shite) blog post and its author without tarring everybody within six degrees of separation with the same brush, and it’s quite unsettling that people find such nuance so difficult.

badosu 1y ago

This. While I am all for making conscious choices on what to support I can't take anything phrased like that seriously "all is contributors". Hyprland, while inferior (imo) in some aspects to sway on the wayland tiling manager landscape is a fine piece of software that I use on my non-work computer (I still use sway for stability). Back on the topic: I reiterate I'd be happy to avoid using or supporting projects based on non-purely technical issues (discussion on "pure technicality" omitted for brevity). It's just... What, do I need to know every persons imo completely irrelevant opinions on whatever du jour hot political topic? Maybe the answer could be yes, I would be fine with dropping Hyprland support, maybe I will after digging a bit more. But this whole thing just reeks to me of terminally informed and ragebaited people looking for a platform to vomit their completely irrelevant opinions, actions speak more (e.g. fostering a dangerous environment _adjacent to the project_ based on discrimination). I just feel I want to nope out of this industry and everything related to it, it's very overwhelming.

the_gastropod 1y ago
> What, do I need to know every persons imo completely irrelevant opinions on whatever du jour hot political topic? No. But if they're using their social capital they've built via their software contributions (like DHH) to spread racist nonsense, then maybe it's worth considering alternatives, or at the very least, stop supporting those projects.
- badosu 1y ago
  Sure, but I think there's a spectrum when making that decision: "should keep their bullshit to themselves" <---> "should perhaps take leadership and avoid having their public channel a cesspool" <---> "actively encourages/participates in discriminatory practices" <---> "raging maniac hurting people, rallying for X" Specifically on the topic of RubyGems: I couldn't care less about what DHH posts or not, I certainly care that he uses his position to influence a chain of actors to interfere with something that always worked just because X. I couldn't care less about the other side on the "cancel" mission, I care about influencing a chain of actors to interfere with something that always worked just because Y. Please quarantine your political polarization/culture wars bullshit, non-anglo countries don't need it.

ljm 1y ago

Turns out guilt by association is problematic whether it’s a Gestapo tactic or a terminally online one. People need to step back and breathe. It’s possible to feel one thing about a (frankly shite) blog post and its author without tarring everybody within six degrees of separation with the same brush, and it’s quite unsettling that people find such nuance so difficult.