3 ms·

Wait, so is it stupid non-science we should insult? Or is it just a claim that we can't verify without a deep dive into methodology? Hopefully those are two ver

Wait, so is it stupid non-science we should insult? Or is it just a claim that we can't verify without a deep dive into methodology? Hopefully those are two very different things.

TimorousBestie 1y ago
I did not and am not taking a stance on the alleged science or non-science because I can’t bloody read it. EDIT: You are quoting an entirely different user, I never said it wasn’t science. THAT WAS SOMEONE ELSE.
- mmooss 1y ago
  edit: The parent is correct, another user said that. Sorry.
- brookst 1y ago
  Apologies for thinking you were echoing their point and for making you so angry.