> Humanoid robots are handicapped by their similarity to humans which is really an artificial constraint. YES, and I wish people would stop pretending we've un

> Humanoid robots are handicapped by their similarity to humans which is really an artificial constraint. YES, and I wish people would stop pretending we've unlocked some new generality by promoting generic humanoid robots over task-specific ones. You can probably Rube-Goldberg your way to a diaper-changing robotic enclosure with a 3D baby bidet that uses many low-force robot arms to subdue (most) babies, but a humanoid robot is a very a poor substitute for a human here. Plus, a human can take personal responsibility for the baby's safety, which is not something a robot can ever do, unless we somehow make the robot fear for its life/freedom/employment the same way the overarching social/legal system does for humans who sign contracts or accept highly accountable roles.