4 ms·
Personally, I think it's the other way around. Sci-fi writers understood both what technology could create in the future (and what would be desirable), and als
by rkomorn 1y ago
Personally, I think it's the other way around.
Sci-fi writers understood both what technology could create in the future (and what would be desirable), and also understood how people abuse power and the tools available to them to stay in power (or gain more).
In other words: they predicted the future, more than they inspired it. IMO, that also makes their writing that much more interesting.
- CaptainOfCoit 1y agoSurprisingly, I never considered that, and agree that it makes the writing more interesting, I'm gonna keep this in mind for future stories. Thanks a lot for sharing that :)
- rkomorn 1y agoRelatedly, somewhat, I've been reading a lot of 19th century French literature (because I'm French and because my sister is a literature teacher who's been "assigning" me stuff to read). It has been somewhat shocking to see how relevant the writing is seen through a 21st century lenses. Whether it's how media works, how cliques of people function, etc. It truly feels timeless in a way that I've found very surprising. It also very much supports notions that people don't change even if means and methods do.