3 ms·
I always find it hilarious and painfully ironic that Anthropic can't even keep Claude Code's docs up to date. I don't know how much to read into it, but it is a
by redhale 1y ago
I always find it hilarious and painfully ironic that Anthropic can't even keep Claude Code's docs up to date. I don't know how much to read into it, but it is a modern marvel of process failure.
The team is obviously doing a lot of cool things very rapidly, so I don't want to be too negative, but ... please just ask Claude to review your own docs before you merge a change.
- etothet 1y agoNot saying you’re wrong, but can you cite a couple of examples?
- redhale 1y agoLooking through the issues tagged "documentation" provides many examples (https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues?q=label%3Adocumentation https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues?q=label%3Ad...). It's so common they have an issue template for "Missing documentation (feature not documented)". Here are a few recent open ones: - "Documentation missing for new 'Explore' subagent" - https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/9595 https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/9595 - "Missing documentation for modifying tool inputs in PreToolUse hooks" - https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/9185 https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/9185 - "Missing Documentation for Various Claude Code Features (CLI Flags, Slash Commands, & Tools)" - https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/8584 https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/8584