4 ms·
Forbes 30 under 30 never misses
by Vosporos 1y ago
Forbes 30 under 30 never misses
- throwaway-0001 1y agoWTH good ranking for Forbes. How much % is fraud at Forbes? JPMorgan was lured in by what appeared to be a database of 4 million users. In reality, that figure hovered around 300,000 users. Federal prosecutors had requested a 12-year prison sentence. Lawyers for Ms Javice, who had pleaded not guilty, had asked for just 18 months. US District Judge Alvin Hellerstein also ordered Ms Javice to forfeit more than $22m - and pay more than $287m to JPMorgan together with her co-defendant Olivier Amar, the start-up's chief growth and acquisition officer. Ms Javice, 33, made a name for herself in finance after founding Frank in 2017. The start-up was lauded for helping students navigate the college financial aid process, and Ms Javice was named on the Forbes '30 Under 30' list two years after starting the company.
- lazyasciiart 1y agoWhat?
- throwaway-0001 1y agoHow much % of Forbes is fraud? Anyone keeps tracking?
- nashashmi 1y agoI think all of them have been found guilty of something
- lazide 1y agoThe dot-com Era equivalent was getting a Fast Money cover shot.
- throwaway-0001 1y agoThe wall of shame says is 99.9% legit. I doubt that
- jacquesm 1y agoYes. Like an investment by SoftBank that's almost a kiss of death now. They even have a hall of shame.
- alfiedotwtf 1y agoIf SoftBank invests in a 30 Under 30 founder, does it cancel each other out, or does it effectively speed-run the time between investment and jail time
- blitzar 1y agoThe criteria to be on the list is having a PR team to get you on the list. The overlap between Under 30's with a PR team dedicated to getting them "on the list" and grifters, shysters and con artists is pretty big.
- glimshe 1y agoMost of successful founders are over 40. They should probably drop the paradigm entirely and start publishing a "40 over 40" list for up and coming founders.
- lazide 1y agoThey didn’t care about success. They cared about flash and notoriety. Which notably aren’t very often correlated with long term success, but aren’t completely divorced from it either. The thing to realize is that the news is about notable things, and things are notable when they’re not normal/standard/boring. In your personal life, it’s often (actually) ideal to live a life that no newspaper reporter would give a second thought about writing up.
- BobbyTables2 1y agoIt’s odd, seems like most executives 40 and up seem to only care about flash and notoriety too…
- lazide 1y agoThe ones I’ve seen who actually get things done, weren’t particularly. And if not actually getting things done, in my experience the shelf life is short. But hey, lots of different ways to get money, and as long as you can avoid a fraud charge I guess?
- dzonga 1y agoit has become a go to list of who to be scammers.
- recursivecaveat 1y agoFor the record there are several regions, most with many many categories (some rather sad ones from the NA list: "venture capital", "social media", "retail and e-commerce", and "marketing and advertising"). There were 1230 total people on the global lists this year. Of course Forbes can't really defend itself because the notion of a "twelve hundred under 30" damages the pay-to-play golden goose. I would recommend poking around the list if you ever want a mood lightener. There are a truly comical number of people whose bio reads: "co-founder (CEO is over 30) of AI powered yadada which has raised $3M from investors". I think the median 30u30 business actually has considerably less revenue than a typical convenience store.