4 ms·
I think it is generally not worth to change the names of the existing branches, including probably this one, but it might not be a problem. As far as I know, ch
by zzo38computer 1y ago
I think it is generally not worth to change the names of the existing branches, including probably this one, but it might not be a problem. As far as I know, changing branch names in git does not change the hashes (and the name "main" does not consist entirely of hex digits, etc), so it should probably be OK, although still something I personally would probably not have done. (I would have no problems with making the default branch name "main" for a new repository rather than an existing one, although I prefer "trunk")