> A better title for this article: Some Functions Are Asymmetric. If some functions are asymmetric, then functions (as a class of things) are not symmetric. J

> A better title for this article: Some Functions Are Asymmetric. If some functions are asymmetric, then functions (as a class of things) are not symmetric. Just as some rectangles are squares, still leaves rectangle as a class/type as transpose asymmetric. I.e. width and height are not constrained to be equivalent, which is required for transpose symmetry. Not really arguing for or against your comment. Just noting that it’s easy for multiple valid arguments to pass each other without connecting due to slight differences in what people mean with the same words.