3 ms·
> you're repeating google marketing. No I am not. I remember this clearly and all my friends were complaining about it before chrome was released. I just check
by Flamingoat 1y ago
> you're repeating google marketing.
No I am not. I remember this clearly and all my friends were complaining about it before chrome was released. I just checked the dates. Firefox 3 was released a whole year before Chrome.
I really don't appreciate it when people tell me that I have been swayed by some big company, when my friends and I were complaining about it before we even knew that Google had a browser.
Firefox used to just completely lock up. Wouldn't load a tab. Chrome didn't with the same number of tabs. I am not talking about JS perf speed or anything like that, I am talking about the browser just not locking up when using more than few tabs.
- 1oooqooq 1y agothat's my point. you're comparing a very capable debugger that used all your 4gb at the time. then came chrome with a very limited dev tool which used slightly less than your full 4gb of ram and you liked it, but never considered having ff without all the js debugging niceties that ate the extra ram.
- Flamingoat 1y agoNo it wasn't that at all. When browsing Firefox 3.0 would randomly not load a site when say about 10 tabs were in the window and hang for about 30 seconds. It was annoying. There was an obvious issue with how it handled the tab isolation (it didn't really that was the issue). IE 8 and Opera didn't do this. It has nothing to do with my impression of Google Chrome because Google Chrome didn't exist at the time.