3 ms·
And which of those things that people could build already in mid-90s require some nebulous unspecified "new broswer features"? Perhaps they could start with ju
by troupo 1y ago
And which of those things that people could build already in mid-90s require some nebulous unspecified "new broswer features"?
Perhaps they could start with just cutting down their bloated 100x-duplicated 4MB CSS file?
- userbinator 1y ago<video> tag is probably the biggest change, but I still remember YT used SWF/FLV before then (and likely could still do today). However, it's clear that the devs are mainly composed of trendchasing sheeple who have drunk the Goog-Aid and are addicted to newness and reinventing wheels to make them square... because they have to justify their existence.
- Tommy430 1y agoYT2009 and WarpStream (Protoweb) prove the old YouTube can still work today. The new one is just a cat and mouse game of diminishing returns.