4 ms·

AGI nowhere near

• skylurk 1y ago
  I know I'm replying to a shitpost. But I had a realisation, and I'm probably not the only one. If you can manage to keep structuring slightly intelligent tools so that they compound, seems like AGI is achievable. That's why the thing everyone is after right now is new ways to make those slight intelligences keep compounding. Just like repeated multiplication of 1.001 grows indefinitely.
  • gigatree 1y ago
    But how often can you repeat the multiplication when the repetitions are unsustainable?
    • skylurk 1y ago
      Yeah, sometimes it feels like we're just layering unintelligent things, with compounding unintelligence... But starting earlier this year, I've started to see glimpses of what seems like intelligence (to me) in the tools, so who knows.
      • laurentiurad 1y ago
        things like being able to say how many R's are in strawberry
  • Lionga 1y ago
    I know I'm replying to a shitpost. Well enough said.
    • laurentiurad 1y ago
      do you feel the agi?
  • laurentiurad 1y ago
    yea if you can afford to burn infinite money to get slight increments in quality then sure