4 ms·
> it was about 25% better than the control Please give more details, because I've done antibiotic susceptibility tests for 20 years and I'm not aware of any co
by M95D 1y ago
> it was about 25% better than the control
Please give more details, because I've done antibiotic susceptibility tests for 20 years and I'm not aware of any control used like that.
- slau 1y agoSorry, I’m not at all into biology so I didn’t know how to express it. I just meant that over the course of 72 hours, the speed at which the Petri dish with the less-effective antibiotic was filling up seemed to lag behind the control by about 24 hours. At 72 hours both were “full” regardless.
- M95D 1y agoI'm sorry but that's not how susceptibility tests are done. Not by far. Here, free videos from EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing): https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQU_kWRWBld4fDhv1T1KOR5bKUUTJ2v6W https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQU_kWRWBld4fDhv1T1KO...