3 ms·
I agree, I was stuck on boost::optional for a long time for this reason, and I only use boost::variant2 for my variant needs, although code can still build with
by jcelerier 1y ago
I agree, I was stuck on boost::optional for a long time for this reason, and I only use boost::variant2 for my variant needs, although code can still build with std:: in case a customer really does not want boost