3 ms·
Personally, I read it as added-emphasis rather than a retort against the author, but I can see how it could be taken that way depending on assumed verbal delive
by Terr_ 1y ago
Personally, I read it as added-emphasis rather than a retort against the author, but I can see how it could be taken that way depending on assumed verbal delivery.
- guerrilla 1y agoI see what you mean.
- ok_dad 1y agoI also read it that way, I didn't take it as an assault. Because I was in the military in the past and because I grew up on the US continent, I probably have it ingrained in me to not use the words of violence like "murder" for these things, and instead I use the softer words that don't explicitly call out the death that is inflicted by the "bombing". I should work on that, for sure.